"Haaretz: The Angry White Men That Gave Trump and Sanders Their Victories
CNN: Why Americans Are So Angry in 2016:The Rise of Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders, Many Say, Is a Reflection of the Anger in America Today.
Fortune: Why Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders Both Appeal to Angry, White Men
Wall Street Journal: Angry White Males Propel Donald Trump—and Bernie Sanders"
This is such a pathetic low blow to the intelligence of the electorate. That anyone who supports Sanders or Trump is "an angry white male". The best way not to treat an opponent's valid argument is to smear him/her, lump him/her, label and finally consign to an disreputable, unworthy-to-engage position. I am not sure if the "what male" categorization of everyone disillusioned with the present state of the US government is meant in some way as the diametrical opposition of Clinton's prime appeal among those who believe in the female-president ideology. It would be politically incorrect to say that Clinton's vote base is large among the feminist cheer crowds, for they are are supposed to be rational people who are impressed with her merit, accomplishments and her potential for "getting things done". Yet, no character assassination when proclaiming confidently that the "white males" support Sanders or Trump because they are emotionally moved by the white boy identity appeals of their candidates.
The founding fathers in every nation had high hopes in democracy and the separation they had insisted between legislative and executive powers, free press and privately owned economy. They would be shocked to see the level of collusion that can disease the notion of democracy in order to protect the power, wealth and incumbency of a minority class.