Home | About | Donate

Ahed’s Generation: Why the Youth in Palestine Must Break Free from Dual Oppression

Why America must break free from Israeli subversion of our sovereignty, politics, and Congress - as well as their state-racism, and terrorism!

The wholesale “meddling” in US elections by Israel, Nuttyyahoo, and the AIPAC traitors has been tolerated and ignored for decades to our great shame!

“The Israeli parliament has passed a law that allows the minister of interior to revoke the residency rights of any Palestinian in Jerusalem on grounds of “breach of loyalty” to Israel” - “Under the new measure, Israel’s Interior Minister Aryeh Deri, leader of the ultra-Orthodox political party Shas, will be able to strip the residency documents of any Palestinian who he deems a threat.”


In addition to Israeli subversion of US elections and Congress members, there is the very dangerous subversive influence over US foreign policy decisions to get America into another ME-NA war - Netanyahu meeting with trump and speaking before AIPAC IS subversion of US, far more serious than the allegations against “Russia”…really Russian oligarchs and bankers that manipulate trump and family…the “Russian” meddling…


Yeah, where is Rachel Corrie when we need her?

1 Like

Admittedly, Israel will have some serious karma over this. Do you know of any advocacy groups supporting Palestinians?

1 Like

Interesting, one of the psychologists I use to work with had to do behavior assessments on the aggressive behavior of the Three Stooges. There are all sorts of things you can learn by trained observation.


It is staple of the Zionist narrative to parrot that it was the indigenous Palestinians who started it all (“declared war”), and having lost, must now live with the consequences.

But if I try to “partition” your land without your consent and you resist, who really “started” it? Can it really be said that your resistance legalized or justified my taking because you had the temerity to use violence?

Contrary to the contention that the Palestinian resistance is to blame for the creation/expansion of Israel, it should be noted that most Zionists have always believed that the Jewish people had an inherent and inalienable right to Palestine.

Religious Zionists have stated this in biblical terms, referring to the divine promise of the land to the tribes of Israel. Secular Zionists, on the other hand, have relied more on the argument that Palestine alone could solve the problem of Jewish dispersion and virulent anti-Semitism.

But, let’s be clear here, NEVER was the consent of the native population ever seriously taken into consideration by any of these Zionists, the Europeans or the UN.

To claim that the Palestinians are to blame for their own dispossession, for having the temerity to resist this forcibly-imposed dictum, is simply ludicrous.


Rubbish! False zionist propaganda and you know it “jack”!

The Zionist forces, including the several terrorist organizations - Haganah, Lehi, Irgun, Stern Gang, were fully armed and trained for over a decade before 1948 - the Palestinians were not, they were and remain victims!

The early Zionist leaders planed to expand territory as soon as possible to take more land by force from a mostly civilian population! That continues - Jerusalem - under the Israeli stooge and fool trump!

Your “history” is hasbara BS propaganda without basis in fact! That MO of taking territory by racist ethnic cleansing by force has been the Israeli zionist model since the 1948 partition and declaration. The 500 or so Palestinian villages emptied and immediately destroyed by Jewish terrorist groups so “there would be no place for Palestinians to come home to” was the premeditated plan as you also know…including the massacre of Palestinians at Deir Yassin! Israel has been very good at lies and deceit - false history and manipulating the press/media especially the lap-dog US media - very bad at speaking any truth!

The Israeli/Zionist plan to “get America into our fight” by any means possible, including the pre-mediated Israeli sneak attack on the USS Liberty killing and wounding over 200 US sailors, was only one example of that depraved indifference for any and all other peoples lives or International Law! There WILL be a high price to pay for the killings/murders of so many innocents and destruction by terrorist Israel!



BDS! Remember Rachel Corrie and the USS Liberty! NEVER Forget!


“The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), (IS) the Israeli Fifth Column in the United States,”

AIPAC is An organization (and membership) that holds first loyalty to a foreign power to the detriment of the US and subverts and manipulates US elections and politics!! THAT is the definition of treason! Israel has been manipulating our elections and Congress and foreign policy for decades! AIPAC manipulates R’Cons and DINO Dems - the issue is what coutry do you hold first loyalty to, Israel and Zionist expansionism or your own nation? Again treason to support another nation over the interests of your own cloaked in racist religion!

Israel also subverts other nations like the UK with foreign agents pushing rubbish propaganda and racist excuses for war crimes!


1 Like

And the Stern Gang? LEHI? The Irgun? Menachem Begin? Were they also for “self-defense” “jack”, or just religious extremist terrorists to steal the lands of other people? Or ordinary thieves taking what they want using religion as a cloak?

https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/professor-hate-israeli-scholar-urges-ethnic-cleansing-bedouins - Israel ethnically cleanses the Negev Bedouin to steal the land!

Some early zionist leaders eventually admitted expansion of Israel was a pre-meditated plan. Israeli historians like Benny Morris also write about the truth of extremist expansion and racist ethnic cleansing…

http://ifamericaknew.org/history/origin.html - Origin of the Palestine-israel Conflict

Your lies and selected false history is proven to be fabrications.



“Palestine belongs to the Arabs in the same sense that England belongs to the English or France to the French…What is going on in Palestine today cannot be justified by any moral code of conduct…If they [the Jews] must look to the Palestine of geography as their national home, it is wrong to enter it under the shadow of the British gun. A religious act cannot be performed with the aid of the bayonet or the bomb. They can settle in Palestine only by the goodwill of the Arabs… As it is, they are co-sharers with the British in despoiling a people who have done no wrong to them. I am not defending the Arab excesses. I wish they had chosen the way of non-violence in resisting what they rightly regard as an unacceptable encroachment upon their country. But according to the accepted canons of right and wrong, nothing can be said against the Arab resistance in the face of overwhelming odds.” Mahatma Gandhi

your are an hasbara propagandist and liar…




You repeat a commonly proffered (but erroneous) myth about Palestinian refusal to live with Jews. The fact of the matter is that Jews had been living alongside Palestinian Arabs (both Christian and Muslim) for a very long time. Your mention of the presence of a sizable Jewish population in Palestine implies that you know this.

And while Zionists like to point to this long-term Jewish presence, this presence was a result of the actions of the Islamic Saladin, who encouraged the Jewish re-population of Jerusalem after capturing it in 1187, and then by the Islamic Ottomans thereafter, notwithstanding Zionists’ often blatant Islamophobia.

What changed all this was Zionist Project of the late 19th and early 20th century, and the “immigrants” it funded openly declaring that they intended to forcibly create a separate religiously exclusivist state in their place of refuge. The Zionist Project did not begin in 1948, and your mention of 1920’s shows that you know this as well.

By continuing to repeat this false narrative, you intentionally seek to obscure the main cause of the conflict with half-truths (myths if you will) like your post about the Palestinians’ alleged refusal to live together with Jews (despite centuries of evidence to the contrary).



That notion that Israel was innocuously created by “buying land” or “immigration” is a commonly proffered Zionist myth. But it’s not true.

First, “immigrants” and “land owners” do not normally openly declare that they intend to forcibly create a separate state in their place of refuge, with or without the consent of its indigenous population as the Zionists did.

Second, according to the census records of both the Ottomans and the British, Palestine in 1882 had a small, native, and migrant religious Jewish community of roughly 24,000 among a Palestinian population of nearly 500,000.

Despite the extensive legal and illegal ideological “immigration” of Jews to Palestine in the 1930’s, it is undisputed that at the time of Israel’s unilateral declaration of statehood, Jews owned just 7 percent of the whole area of the country, and constituted less than 1/3 of its total population.

What Zionists did in Palestine was intentionally and forcibly create a religiously exclusivist state in a land that was ethnically and religiously diverse. Pretending that its creation was innocuous and similar to “immigration” or “buying land” in other countries is simply and demonstrably false.

1 Like


Notwithstanding your repeated claims to the contrary, the Zionist Project did NOT begin in 1947. It began as the brain-child of mostly 19th and early 20th century European Zionists who wanted to create a Jewish state in a land where the overwhelming majority of its indigenous residents for the past 2000 years were not Jewish.

Accordingly, it should come as no surprise that the concept of ethnic cleansing (euphemistically called “population transfer”) came to be embraced by nearly ALL shades of opinion in the Zionist movement.


As stated by Ben Ehrenreich:

“The problem is fundamental: Founding a modern state on a single ethnic or religious identity in a territory that is ethnically and religiously diverse leads inexorably either to politics of exclusion (think of the 139-square-mile prison camp that Gaza has become) or to wholesale ethnic cleansing. Put simply, the problem is Zionism.”



Again you repeat myths when facts are easily available regarding ownership of land in Palestine.

You do know that both the British and the Ottomans kept and maintained land records?

But perhaps that’s why you prefer myths instead…



Yes of course, you are right (on your word alone without any actual evidence) and the official land records of the British, the Ottomans and the UN are ALL wrong. LOL.

1 Like


While I appreciate your honesty in finally admitting that Israel is a colonial enterprise along the lines of what we perpetrated upon the native-Americans, unlike the native-Americans, the Palestinians still have the keys/deeds to the land from which they were expelled just seven decades ago. This sin is still reparable.

That there are ANY Palestinians still left in Israel is not the result of a lack of trying on Zionists’ part, but a testament to the will of the Palestinian people.

Finally, whatever one may think about the claim Palestinian Arabs may have to Palestine, the Zionist claim that any Jew (even an American or European one who converted just yesterday) has a GREATER right to the land than these indigenous peoples is the height of ludicrousness.

1 Like


Again, the Zionist Project did not begin in 1948, no matter how many times you wish to repeat it.

The mutual expulsions were triggered by the Zionist Project (1890’s-1948) and its vocal aim of the forcible creation of a Jewish State in Palestine, not the other way around.

You either have a reading comprehension problem, or are being deliberately obtuse.

Good day, sir.

1 Like


If you are trying to distance Israel from being called a colonial enterprise, you’re not doing a very good job, at least with the “Case for Israel” pamphlet you cite.

The thrust of the argument therein, again a popular Zionist myth but untrue, is that most of these lands were “publicly-owned.” Even assuming this to be true (which it demonstrably is not), lands that were allegedly “given” to Israel by the British and/or the UN are only rightly “given” if you accept that the British and/or the UN had a greater right to the land than its indigenous population.

Nor did I realize that an indigenous populations’ lack of an actual sovereign state was an excuse to take their land. Interesting.

I find such claims a refreshing admission (implicit that it is, of course) that the Zionist Project is the successor colonial endeavor to that of British and the Ottomans.

I repeat, whatever one may think about the claim Palestinian Arabs may have to Palestine, the Zionist claim that any Jew (even a converted European or American one) has a GREATER right to the land than these indigenous peoples is the height of ludicrousness.

1 Like

Yeah right. I’m sure there are people all over the world thinking if only I could immigrate to the Gaza strip. Sure.

1 Like

What it means is that someone else that doesn’t have a vested interest in an outcome should decide disputes. Playing with a stacked deck is generally considered cheating by most definitions.

1 Like

No doubt, there was a lot of migration after WWI. So?

1 Like