This is an interesting video. It also could serve as Exhibit A to how the solidarity term of WE is being used for purposes that undermine the collective ideals of humanity.
Mr. Donahue sponsoring Walter Cronkite is presenting a case for a World Court--like the one that currently has no enforcement powers--that would hold those who make war at their pleasure accountable for THEIR acts. And he specifies this.
The "New World Order" that Bush Sr. and Jr. (along with the whole neocon team) promote is one BASED ON military might. And with it, the control of populations down to spying on their private lives, undermining established Civil Liberties and inventing enemies to murder sans judge, jury, or legal representation.
These are 2 radically different visions. One is based on a community of nations fostering a climate of justice that makes war impossible. The other is an authoritarian command that subsumes all dissent into its own vision of world domination THROUGH force. It enforces uniformity, conformity, and obedience like all soldier-based social orders.
Like the Alpha and Omega, or Yin and Yang: the code of Creation, the very biological language of life as shown in DNA's double helix... the term WE must speak of the TWIN sides of "the force."
I have observed the covert ways that the WE term is used to conflate what is done by Mars-ruled mad men (and a few token women equally enamored with the sort of absolute power served up by the Mars-ruled MIC state) with The People just as the derelict acts of corporate predators are equally generalized to include the great amorphous sea of humanity.
If language and its frames didn't matter, there would be no such thing as propaganda and propaganda always serves a power elite. In former times it was the church, then the state or church-state hybrid; and now it's the corporation with each of these entities using armed forces to make THEIR will the will of the land.
Decent people should not readily embrace the we-frame when too often it's used to bring forth the 2nd vision--one that is diabolical, against Creator's gift of Free Will which ONLY operates within an authentically Democratic system, and murdering people on a daily basis.
That WE does not speak for good people! It arrogates to itself the right to speak for all and uses the threat of force to conflate its goals and agenda with the alleged consent of the governed.
Coercion is not free will.
Eliminating alternatives (or thwarting them) is not consensus.
Propaganda and lies told often make a false case for the consent of the governed.
MadSheldon deceptively conflates one--the vision and efforts of peacemakers--with the other: dangerous proponents of endless war and the ecological implications for a DEAD planet that their bankrupt ethos produces. The New World Order of the neocons would be to a just world court what the military tribunals are to "war crimes." All war is a crime!