"You are fanatically… "
No, sorry. Wrong. What I say is based on science and fact. What you say… wow.
“I disagree and make concise arguments that …”
No, sorry. You bloviate and repeat your own nonsense with no evidence or support of any kind.
"I try to make clear points "
Oops. You fail.
“You are unable to express anywhere near a clear viewpoint on BEV in your own words.”
Uh, sorry, but these are all my own words and the argument is quite clear. You wear the bizarreness of your argument, ignored or rejected by every single other person or group I’ve ever read, like a denying delayalist wears the “I’m just like Galileo” badge: Everyone disagreed with Galileo and he turned out to be right. Everyone disagrees with me therefore I must be right. It’s the argument of crazy inventor types, aka nutcase narcissists, the world over.
“You’re just a follower, repeating what you’re told as loyal as any…”
Again, disdain from you for anyone who’s not a lone n.n. But in fact I’ve been pushing beyond the curve for solar, wind, efficiency, wiser lives, the primacy of ecology, for decades, and sounding the alarm most–like you–still don’t understand on how dire the climate crisis is and how massive, radical and immediate the solutions need to be. And the bit at the end I just left off, as you go off the rails completely, trying to associate me with the lunatic right wing anti-science morons, who you have a lot more in common with than I do.
“You rely on others to lead you where they think purists like them mistakenly believe is best.”
First, you’ve conflated a bunch of arguments into an incoherent mishmash a lot like the rest of your ideas. Second, I rely on experts and science, which is obviously foreign to you since you provide no evidence ever for your lunacy, just repeat your own illogical assertions over and over and over. The experts and science aren’t purist, they’re experts, scientists, and science. And practical experience, like 450,000 EV buses and 20,000 miles of high speed rail moving people around in China right now. (It’s an integrated system in which each part depends on the other parts or it wouldn’t work.) Your nutcase conspiracy theories notwithstanding, this is how progress is made.
But on reconsidering I’ve decided to compose a letter to be sent to the Chinese government and several thousand city governments with your revealed knowledge from on high that Buses Aren’t Very Good. I’m sure they’ll scrap them all immediately, including the 450,000 EV buses in China, which, actually, make perfectly good vehicles that can charge at every stop and use and store solar from panels on the buses, the shelters, the stations, parking lots and other structures. But never mind that, I’ve given them your number so no doubt they’ll all be calling you soon to find out what to replace the many trillions of dollars worth of vehicles and infrastructure with now that we know Buses Aren’t Very Good.
“Your utterly bizarre, non-sequitur strawman interpretation of my view is crude."
You left out " laughable and hostile and your last little bit of lunacy makes it clear just how anti-logical this obsession of yours is." I’m merely describing what you’re doing. I stand by it. Please stop distorting my arguments.
“greasy [bacon] truck stops”???!!
Again? Holy frgoking fecal matter fellan, what a nut. Your attempts at insults are as nonsensical and non-sequitur as your theory.
“They include little regard for car dependency, traffic havoc, related costs of living, corporate control, etc.”
Not a single activist I know thinks anything remotely like that. More bjullsjhit straw personing from you. Please don’t do that any more.
"“favors vast solar farms located in rural settings next to…blah blah”
No, it doesn’t. You are being an aß. You’re lying. You’re using more straw person idiocy. Please stop.
“…as yet unquestioned) global economy…”
You clearly don’t know anything about me and again, are blowing it out your aß, willing to say anything no matter how untrue or absurd to try to attack me. Please stop doing that.
“I contend PHEV tech “distributes” battery and charging resources to many Hundreds more PHEV households than possible with fleets of Tesla ‘S’ sedans and freight trucks”
Oh! Well, now I get it! It just took that one more time saying exactly the same thing in exactly the same way with no more evidence than before for me to understand and agree with you! 17th time’s a charm, I’ve always said. See? You were right. You are just like Galileo.
“You resort to name calling far more than I have in return.”
Doesn’t that mean I win? Otherwise I have no idea what the point of you pointing that out is. I had more targets with big Ms on them for Moran. Everything I’ve said has been true. Almost everything you’ve said attacking me has been not just untrue but ludicrous. You’re clearly mistaking me for someone else, over and over and over. It’s clearly persisting despite being corrected. That’s known as a delusion. Please find someone who can help you with that.