So, let's keep Trump because Pence is worse? " You say tomato, I say potato, you like Clamato, I like cilantro. Let's call the whole thing off " WTF?
If Trump broke the laws, oh well, Pence could make the situation worser or even more worser than that. It could be the actual worstestest ever. WTF, again? And, Eddie Munster? " Oh, the horror, the horror, Joseph Conrad "
Gosh, situational ethics rears its speculative head and has decidedly chosen to keep The Don of Loyalty Oaths ( who sounds, looks and acts like The Capo de Capo ) because his heir might be ( might emphasized here ) even more damaging.
OK. Got it. That makes perfect sense and definitely is well within the traditional framework of judicial proceedings. While intent may be difficult to prove legally, it sometimes is pretty easy to see in everyday life.