Edward A Hara:
, I read that the wedding planner suggested that cake place…and if so, then the Supreme Court is subprime once again----------. I don’t understand why this is a religious argument. Doesn’t it all come down to “do unto others?” All religions say something like that it seems.
So, that cake place will only do wedding cakes for Christians male and female-----( although there are many diverse groups and religions.)
If the 2 guys had asked for a Father’s Day Cake…could they have gotten one pf those? And if so, the cake man only get upset about wedding cakes for same sex people-------or do we not know that?
I wonder what the Supremes would say, if the cake man wouldn’t make a cake for a Jewish wedding? How about for 2 divorced people getting married? Would he do a shotgun wedding cake? Would he do a dog wedding cake? How about a polygamy wedding?
This seems all wrong for the Supremes to agree with cake man----------how could cake man make a living with so many variables in religions-----and will his signage now read ---------“WEDDING CAKE EMPORIUM—unless I don’t like your gender, religion, looks or , existence”