Home | About | Donate

'Does Anyone Think That's a Bad Thing?': Leaked Zuckerberg Audio Suggests Warren Vow to Break Up Facebook Has Tech Giant Spooked

Give some examples and demonstrate that they are “barren of substance”. Throw out a few issues, show how authoritarian they are (as if the continuous move to the right since Reagan has strengthened democracy and made the system less corrupt), and then demonstrate how barren of substance they are. Also, give some ideas of what you think would be better. Oh, and use your brain. Like, I don’t need Hayek and Rothbard bumper stickers. If I want mindless and a-historic silliness, I know where to find Reason magazine or some other rag that billionaires fund to fill people’s heads with nonsense. I seem to remember, when I tortured myself by going into economics, my professors talking about the evils of monopolies and oligopolies, and they weren’t teaching us Das Capital, but maybe in some magical universe they aren’t an issue. Thanks.


Warren: “Capitalist to my bones” Warren to split Progressive vote and allow Biden to Win the Primary

If she truly supports the MFA/GND/FC agenda, why run against Sanders and split the vote?

  • Obama packed his entire economic team with Wall Street bankers and their henchmen (Hillary Clinton) who in turn tapped Warren to oversee that the TARP funding got to the Too-Big-To-Fail (TBTF) banks without strings attached and later centralize financial oversight under a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau that reports to the private Federal Reserve, owned by the same TBTF banks who caused the crisis. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8190 (see attachments for Citibank recommendations of Kamala Harris and Hillary Clinton) https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/3476 (see Hillary Clinton aide’s recommendation of Elizabeth Warren before Obama’s announcement 9/17/2010) https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2010/09/17/president-obama-names-elizabeth-warren-assistant-president-and-special-a

  • After Sanders 2016 bid propelled the “Our Revolution” agenda to be favored by a high majority of Americans, Warren adopts similar if not exactly the same agenda items in her bid for President in 2020. No reason given for why Warren is running against Sanders in 2020 with policies so similar and why Warren could not find a difference significant enough to endorse Sanders over Clinton in 2016.

Warren gives standing ovation to Trump - America will never be Socialist https://twitter.com/jacobinmag/status/1094791599685582849?lang=en

Warren criticized about Trump defense/offense budget vote https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLLvXCeHogM

Warren’s Billionaire donors https://twitter.com/philosophrob/status/1101532315770068993

Tim Black - Warren massive proposals https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cer6UP-8uFw

Warren is bending to Insiders https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G96MpnYv56E

Warren buttering up Democratic Elites https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WM8m9T9ZBr4

Healthcare executive daughter helps rig WFP endorsement https://twitter.com/CANCEL_SAM/status/1176265744868417538

she is very different in a conversation than when she’s on the stump https://medium.com/@SuperSovietBox/elizabeth-warren-is-not-bernie-with-a-vagina-457f0a93248

The Hill - Warren circles back to Clinton https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ds1u_zTkHuM

Warren OK with Biden corruption https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQLmz-YP49U

Warren Punking America on Medicare For All https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7HwhTWO1-tw

Why Warren’s technocratic approach will fail https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lkzRURcRbkY

Is Warren honest? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYQhb1-JbGE

1 Like

Why didn’t the Winklevoss Bros create their own Facebook when there was still a chance?

Boycotts can be difficult, I understand. And Facebook is baited with your own friends and relatives. Lucky for me, I have their telephone numbers and their e-mail addresses. I don’t know how we can have a revolution if we can’t let go of something as trivial as Facebook.

Ok, I had seen a couple of those, but this is much more than I had explored. I thank you for all the work. I’ll read it all.

(Hm, actually I’m finding this link broken:

If you have the right one, I’ll look at that, too!)

Webwalk I like lots of what you have to say here because PUBLIC OWNERSHIP is the issue. However, fighting Capital appears to TAKE an equal amount of Capital unless and until Citizens United is eviscerated, decapitated and decaying in the ground.

Zuckerberg likes to put out a benign face to the public but when you hear what is going on behind the facade…it is ugly.