You wrote a tautological statement. It is true that Imhotep has one screen name. But the individual using that screen name helps himself to many.
Why is it that whether it's "Were flea" or "John Tredea" or in this case, "inhotep" there is always some soldier boy up first who reinforces State Narratives, speaks often in semi-glib one liners meant to minimize the nature of the topic under discussion; or, falls into the team sport arena level of political analyses?
You know--the one suffused with hatred for only ONE candidate when the system that offers up two lousy would-be Presidents is the real enemy to Truth, Liberty, and the Rule of Law.
I SEE the protocol. The fact that different screen names RELIABLY fulfill it is not a naturally occurring process.
It's interesting that in support of my exposing something that IS fairly well-known and equally widespread, the brilliant documentary on this by Abby Martin apparently was taken down from You Tube.
It showed exactly how I.T. firms hire kids (and these are adjuncts to the MIC) to push particular talking points and narratives.
Many industries have their sock puppets, trolls, and paid messengers in the game, too.
Influence is big business.
Companies like Big Oil, Monsanto, Big Nuclear Power, Big Pharma., and others find it cheap to pay people to follow scripts.
And it certainly goes on here.
Deceiving readers by trying to turn what IS true into the allegation of paranoia on my part is more proof positive of the UNIFORM you wear and what entity you serve.