The anonymous hacker calling themselves Guccifer 2.0 released a second trove of internal documents from Democratic National Committee (DNC) servers on Tuesday, including a hefty 113-page file titled "Hillary Clinton Master Doc" that includes research the party performed on behalf of Clinton's candidacy—months before she declared an intention to run.
"Foundation?" Do they mean "money-laundering scheme?" What percentage of their take went to charity and what percentage went to salaries, travel, entertainment, and other perks?
That's what the private email server was for. To hide her criminal activity.
Don't close Guantanamo yet. We have some highly qualified clients in the pipeline.
The way Trump has previously characterized his opponents as losers, these documents now give him leverage to call anybody flying in a Gulfstream a loser, seeing how the winners like him fly in 757s or other full size jets.
Read "Dark Money" by Jane Mayer and your understanding of tax exempt, so-called charitable foundations will change forever. Money laundering schemes are only a start.
the U.S. State Dept. says that a discrepancy in exit polls of more than 2% indicates fraud, we have had discrepancies outside of that margin in at least 16 of the state primaries all the way up to a discrepancy of 23%. These discrepancies have only happened in one of our political parties and they have all been in favor of one candidate. On top of the exit poll discrepancies there has been reports of ballots cast in the names of deceased citizens, patients of mental hospitals, and elderly people with dementia. There has been reports of registration purging, switching of party affiliations, vote flipping, and massive voter suppression. Not to mention the millions of voters who have not been allowed to vote because they do not claim any party affiliation. Multiple major universities have calculated that in order to get our current results without election fraud, the odds would be 1 in 70 billion.
Rot and corruption.
Dark Money- folks- always follow the money.
Clinton Cash. How in the hell as a person of any conscience can you accept up to $50 million into the Clinton Foundation from mid-east countries that treat women and gays in the most horrible and unimaginable ways? You call yourself a progressive feminist? And on top of it you told Diane Sawyer you were 'dead broke' when you left the White House. What an amazing recovery- from dead broke to personal wealth of $235 million. Damn, that's one hell of a Presidential pension Bill received.
The book is called CLINTON CASH by Peter Schweitzer. It is a must read. And in July- the week of the Democratic Convention, the documentary film based on the book will be released. Go see this movie and tell me if the entire Clinton Foundation is simply a front for those wanting to purchase influence and gain access to the Clintons. Charitable Foundation? Please. Remember Lawrence Lessig- the brilliant Harvard professor who entered the Democratic primary then dropped out? He studied the book and authored a insightful Op-Ed in the Washington Post. Professor Lessig writes “On any fair reading, the pattern of behavior that Schweizer has charged is corruption.” Read the entire piece for yourself: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-clintons-citizens-united-and-21st-century-corruption/2015/05/08/7f11a0d6-f57b-11e4-b2f3-af5479e6bbdd_story.html
Then see the documentary, CLINTON CASH, in July.
And when David Brock, head of one of her Super Pacs, was confronted about this:
"There's no there, there."
Keep to your dirty tricks, Brock- a spokesperson you are not!
Haiti is a good example of taking money and doing nothing this "charity" promised.
I strongly agree with your points!
However, the $250 million questions (the Clintons' new net worth) are:
Will Hillary be held fully accountable under all the laws that she has apparently broken -- in this new U.S. era in which war criminals and torturers, banksters and economy destroyers, and the 1%ers are almost never investigated, indicted, prosecuted, convicted, and sent to prison?
Will we be told by our mis-leaders: "don't pursue any wrongdoings from the past -- just look to the future"?
Is Hillary "too big to fail" and "too big to jail" -- in this neo-USA, where there is one system of "law enforcement" (yeah, right) for the 1%ers, and the heavy hand of law enforcement on the rest of us?
I think all of us here know the most likely answers to these questions.
That would be if we still had laws that cover the rich. Obama and DNC are stopping the release of the FBI investigation.
Given that the excerpt from the Daily Beast, when carefully read is obviously a rather desperate attempt to defend Clinton, what value does it have in this article?
Is this that wretched FOX/NPR style "balance"?
Otherwise, thanks for publicizing this hacker's expose of these corporate whores, Bill and Hillary. (zero disrespect to sex workers)
Not mentioned in this article but located in these leaks is the DNC strategy for manipulating and controlling main stream media.
Shocking? We all knew what was happening- Bernie black out, bias by MSNBC and Huff Post. Plus the well paid trolls hired by David Brock to attack Bernie and his supporters on social media.
The DNC and Debbie Downer. We all knew what was happening- but Hillary supporters didn't seem to mind: Debates scheduled when nobody was watching, Superdelegates stacking the deck before the game was even played, fraudulent election practices, and so much more. But while many of those lame stream pundits called rigging the primaries 'speculation' and the 'Sander's people ignorance of the rules' lo and behold Guccifer 2.0 now surfaces with internal DNC memos about the strategy to rig the game in Hillary's favor. The Queen of the Pay Day lenders should have been fired months ago. But she still has her job and the thought of Bernie and his supporters getting anything of substance approved or accepted at the convention is ridiculous. I sincerely hope everyone who can make a small donation will contribute to Tim Canova- a true progressive seeking to dethrone the Queen from her Florida Congressional seat. When Bill Moyers gets in the game and makes the same observation maybe the DNC should listen- if they care about winning: http://billmoyers.com/story/democrats-cant-unite-unless-wasserman-schultz-goes/
Time to organize Occupy Philly.
Gee, isn't it illegal to accept money from foreign countries when you are SOS and can then act in other countries behalf? We only paid her a salary which is so far down the list of payments and quite small in comparison so we got what we paid for? Nothing? Isn't all this supposed to be reported? Where did the $ go? Was it unreported income? Certainly all the private jets, hotel rooms, phones for her and staff to speak to the banks was income. Was it reported?
Are we stupid enough to allow her nomination?
Well stated, Mark.
This is the tip of the iceberg.
Dark Money, bogus Foundation (charitable my ass)
Main Stream Media doesn't care.
Professor Lessig wrote a brilliant OpEd for Washington Post regarding CLINTON CASH. 'On any fair reading this is corruption.'
And by the way the leaks reveal a strategy to go after the author of CLINTON CASH- so obvious that they were worried about folks following the money.
Thanks for your activism. I'm interested in what you find out.
If you are able and willing to tell us some of what the lawyer tells you, please do.
In addition to delineating Clinton's vulnerabilities, did the hacked documents also include a DNC analysis of how much corporate cash Clinton could land in the Party's war chest ?
Hard to believe any other potential candidate could come anywhere close to Clinton on that metric.
So women who support Clinton will only get what they can pay for, right? What is the value of pro-choice legislation in millions? What are protections from rape worth? Access to birth control? Equal pay?
Ok, so I looked through the leaked docs and I don't see anything that deals with the plan to derail Sanders and fix the election. I would like to see the proof they have of the coordination between Clinton, DNC and media.
Has anyone found that file?
Make the Demos pay for their selling out to neo-liberal economics, neo-conservative foreign policy, for selling out their purported 'people values'. No votes for DNC establishment candidates - don't sell out your own values by fear of the alternative - "The energy that we take and put into the solution is the energy that's going to be in that solution. If fear/anger are used in the solution then the solution is going to have fear/anger in it, and therefore we didn't change anything." - John Trudell, Dec. 15, 2014. Those DNC shillary supporters don't want change, those who do but fear Trump et. al. are selling themselves out. Sanders, or Stein, or your even an admired friend, or just NOBODY for president. Let's quit encouraging them and vote with our courage to be our natural selves, by refusing to be who they count on us to be.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.