Of all the recent drop-ins from the mercenary Bloomberg crowd, you might be the most ridiculous and transparent yet.
“… if the author simply isn‘t a fan of Bloomberg policies or ideas why not just spend energy on this planet to say it vs try to break up the party…”
No, the idea is to expose the DNC for what it is - an establishment frontman desperately trying to maintain the grip their rich donors have on the levers of power.
“Bloomberg was a life-long democrat until 2000”
Yeah, then he decided to stump for Bush who was a war criminal and - oh by the way - cut his taxes which expedited his rise to stupid-levels wealth. A real populist for the working class ya got there.
“I have tons of friends (I‘m from California) who moved to NYC in that era and loved it, and it seems like he was certainly improvement over Guiliani”
A strong contender for absurd, brain-dead anecdote of the year. But I agree, he’s better than Guiliani!
“So yeah while I have qualms with the way he‘s entered the race late, and least he got in and is taking the risk at his legacy/wealth/whatever.”
You added a strong contender to your brain-dead list. Taking a risk at his legacy? Well there’s plenty to choose from. Is it the one as racist ‘stop and frisk’ champion’? Or maybe enemy of public unions? How about his stance on ‘reforming’ SS? He conveniently omitted that opinion on his website. His risk to his - need a second here to wipe the coffee off my screen - wealth!!!??? Some jokes write themselves. But you might have something there with ‘whatever’.
“When Iowa (tech capital of the western world ) of all places builds an „App“ that breaks down on election night sigh we have simpler issues.”
Newsflash for dumbasses - IOWA didn’t build the app. It was a carefully orchestrated scheme by the DNC - with your boy Buttigieg in on it - to muck up the caucus results. You see, the DNC knew the likelihood of a Sanders’ win. And they didn’t have to use a ouija board, either. Party operatives have been canvassing likely voters in Iowa for the past year, using focus groups, phone banks, etc and had enough data to be concerned. Since outright fraud might confirm Bernie supporters claims that the game was rigged, this seemed like a plausible way to at least interrupt his momentum.
“So in summary, I disagree with the attempt at being clever because it simply leads to promoting party fractious ideology.”
Wow, you’re going for the triple crown. Please inform as to what that fractious ideology is. But could you wait awhile, my stomach still hurts from laughing at your considerable humor.
Not only is your post poorly written, your thought process is incoherent, bordering on farce. You paid hacks better wake up or Bloomers is gonna ask for his money back.