Everyone here is missing the point about the reconciliation process. It distorts legislation and the result is a bill that loses half of what was intended.
An article in The New York Times by Ezra Klein titled “The Senate Has Become a Dadaist Nightmare” (Feb 4, 2021), explains well the problems with reconciliation. The article states the following in part:
Massive chunks of our tax code are just set to disappear at an arbitrary point in the future, and what happens then is anybody’s guess.
The distortions don’t end there. Budget reconciliation warps policy design by pushing away from regulation and toward direct spending and taxation.
You can pass $1,400 checks through budget reconciliation, but you can’t pass emergency paid leave. When Congress writes laws through budget reconciliation, it writes them with one arm tied behind its back.
Even worse is the way budget reconciliation quietly decides which kinds of problems the Senate addresses, and which it ignores, years after year. Both House and Senate Democrats have said that their first bill will be the “For The People Act,” a package making it easier and safer to vote, and weakening the power big donors wield in politics by matching small donor donations at a 6:1 rate. But the “For The People Act” can’t pass through the budget reconciliation process, so it’s a dead letter.
So the only answer to this is, get rid of the filibuster!