I didn’t say he was stupid. My implication was that he might be gullible if he thought that was one of the good videos. (There are other possible reasons he might have posted the link in full knowledge that it was malarkey.)
“And you suggested that you are able to tell the difference.”
Most people can–if they make the effort. All it takes is a bit of skepticism, and a bit of follow-up. Here, I’ll illustrate.
For reference, this refers to the Youtube video Goodtimes7 posted, called FUKUSHIMA Update 2018 (IT’S ALL DEAD!) | WatchmanReview
Time mark 0:26 Caldicott has it backwards. Chernobyl was much worse than Fukushima
4:00 Radiactive Calfornia beach sand
5:00 Die-offs – All of the reported kinds of die-offs also occurred prior to 2011. The telling point is that they didn’t have a single marine biologist attributing any adverse environmental or species effects to radionuclide contamination from Fukushima.
Meanwhile, much closer to the site of the disaster, the fish are proliferating in the debris fields off the coast:
And this is not because of any direct benefit from radiation, but because of the indirect benefit of radiation fear leading to reduced fishing in the area. Humans are many times more lethal to sea life than any contaminant radiation (which is low out in the greater Pacific, compared to the amount of radiation that was there before 2011). This is also the reason wildlife is thriving around Chernobyl.
5:36 That’s a tsunami wave height map. It’s use as a contamination map is bogus and was debunked very soon after its first representation as such.
5:40 Notice they don’t say how much Cs-134 radiation was found. Why do you suppose they didn’t include that?
You can see for yourself how much there is.
Click on scarlet tags to see latest results. The detection threshold for Cs-134 is less than 1 bq per cubic meter. The natural radioactivity of seawater is generally around 12,000 to 14,000 bq per cubic meter.
7:24 Fukushima onsite radiation did not “soar” to record levels. They managed to get a reading inside the containment vessels closer to a melted core than ever before, and that’s why the reading was higher than any taken before–simply because they were all taken further away from any core.
9:00 The reason for low numbers of fall chinook salmon in the Klamath:
Radiation and Pacific salmon generally:
10:20 Totally bogus numbers, and the scientific consensus remains that no thyroid cancers due to Fukushima have been detected yet. There is no correlation between thyroid anomalies and contaminated areas, distant prefectures have the same or worse anomaly rates when using the same screening method, and the detection rate in older children is higher than for younger children–the opposite of what we would be seeing if these detections were due to radiation.
“this study found no significant spatial anomalies/clusters or geographic trends of thyroid cancer prevalence among the ultrasound examinees, indicating that the thyroid cancer cases detected are unlikely to be attributable to regional factors, including radiation exposure resulting from the FNPP accident.”
“There is no apparent regional difference in the rate of thyroid cancer cases among the residential areas at the time of the earthquake and, hence, exposure status of the patients. … The pathological findings are similar in children from non-exposed areas.”
11:49 Not even a hint of a connection to radiation, much less to Fukushima radiation.
13:25 Blaming Fukushima for an algal bloom? Seriously?
13:34 From that article:
“Kaler said that neurotoxin poisoning from algal blooms could travel up the food chain, from plankton on up and into the birds’ diets.”
“But it’s also more nuanced than that, because what’s then causing the harmful algal blooms to flourish is another domino in the line leading to dead birds.”
“If you have sea surface temperatures that lend themselves to the algal blooms, if those temperatures are high enough,” Kaler said, “Then you have a warm body of water, and there’s a stagnation in that water column. That’s going to effect everything that’s feeding in the ocean.”
13:48 From that article:
“Wildlife experts said the cause of the die-off is most likely a jump in water temperatures, which are now in the mid-80 degree range.”
13:54 Follow-up article:
14:40 It is very well known that high altitude flights are exposed to greatly elevated levels of cosmic radiation.
15:55 Potassium iodide works by saturating the thyroid to block uptake of Iodine 131. But Iodine 131 is a short term (8-day half life), close proximity food-borne contaminant hazard, particularly in milk from farms close to a source. Taking KI to “rid your body” of radiation received in flight is nonsense–unless they are serving I-131 contaminated food on the flight.
16:04, 17:09 Is this what you’d expect in a science-based video, or a faith-based video?
Nearly everything in that video was wrong, or overblown, or amounted to pure insinuation. It is just as much claptrap as the Youtube Creationist videos, chemtrail videos, and the videos purporting to show that world leaders and celebrities are actually reptiloid alien shape-shifters. I didn’t address a lot of the minor bits because that would have made this even longer, but if you have a part that you thought was particularly compelling, put up the time stamp and I’ll be happy to review it–and present counterevidence if I happen to know of any.