Home | About | Donate

Judge Hands 'Horrifying' Five-Year Prison Sentence to Woman for the Crime of...Voting

Judge Hands 'Horrifying' Five-Year Prison Sentence to Woman for the Crime of...Voting

Julia Conley, staff writer

Highlighting in the most "horrifying" and "insane" manner the way that many states disenfranchise convicted or former felons, a Texas judge is sending a woman to jail for five years for unknowingly casting an illegal vote in the 2016 election when she was on probation.

4 Likes

What ever happened to “letting the punishment fit the crime?”

9 Likes

This sentencing is a direct result of the repug. voter fraud BS. I’m sure Kobach is giggling like a child.

7 Likes

The “punishment” for this “crime” should be obvious: disqualify her provisional ballot and inform her of her voting rights (or lack thereof).

9 Likes

It’s fucking Texas, what else can you say?

12 Likes

In Texas? That’s almost funny. The beatings will intensify until everyone learns where their place is. This poor woman’s place is obviously in a Texas prison for several years.

6 Likes

My mind cannot wrap itself around this! Are you serious? Can any of us stand by while this woman gets swept off to jail for voting?!!! Her appeal needs to be supported by all of us! How can we do it? This is INSANE!

15 Likes

This is just SICK. But then again, this is Texas. This kind of nonsense should never be tolerated in a civil society. Guess that leaves Texas out.

6 Likes

SAY WHAT??! This is the ultimate travesty and puts the lie to all that pledge garbage “land of the free, liberty and justice for all” - it’s all BS as this POS “judge” and FOS laws and so very much more demonstrates beyond all sanity! ENOUGH!

7 Likes

Judge is probably bucking for a federal court position.
What better way to impress the Supreme Leader than to provide a harsh sentence for ‘voting fraud’ by a person of complexion.

11 Likes

I just realized I might have offended children with my comment, for that I apologize.

3 Likes

My take, too. Voting on judgeships allows other elected officials off the hook for their lousy political appts. As bad as patronage since judges are a combination of theorist, teacher and practising atty.

1 Like

Trump is the biggest Fraud alive and he’s allowed to vote for himself?

And this woman gets 5 years in prison for voting?

This is the most fucked up country on Earth right now and it’s all because of Trump.

5 Likes

Tex-Ass-Istan.

3 Likes

I didn’t know that tax fraud was a felony but I guess it is. If I put myself in this dear woman’s position, probably with no great income and two children to provide motherhood for, this means food and clean, decent clothing and a bed and a roof over their heads, then trying to keep a little more of her income for her family seems understandable. Well anyway, so now she’s finished serving her sentence and then naively, while on probation decides she should vote. A judge decides she must serve five years in prison for this?
What would Jesus say about all this being someone who reminded the Pharisees of these words of God, “I desire mercy, not sacrifice.” Besides this, is this any way to encourage people to vote?

10 Likes

I will volunteer to share jail time if another 1825 people will sign up one day each. This is America? How about “Gulag America”. Is this a sick joke by a sick “judge”? Please tell me this is the case.

3 Likes

That this is a black woman and a Texas judge pretty much explains everything you ever want to know about this story. Surely this will be thrown out on appeal.

2 Likes

It ought to be a crime to to vote when not eligible to do so. There are several reasons for the necessity of preventing, e.g., voting more than once, voting based upon identity theft, voting by non-citizens or those who would otherwise be eligible to vote, or voting by criminals whose probation or parole terms forbid such voting.

As with some other types of laws, at times, the results of prosecutions of certain offenders may seem unfair; however, it is up to the court to weight such matters, and consider the purpose of the law, and the underlying circumstances of the crime itself in handing out justice. Also, bear in mind that, in some types of cases, if the court makes untoward exceptions, then it opens up the door for wannabe offenders to consider breaking such laws with the knowledge that they can use the same defense as was used in a past case (with the same fact pattern) wherein the offender had received a relatively light sentence. After all, the purpose of certain laws is not only to punish but to act as a deterrent to other would-be offenders.

That said, I do believe that, in the case at hand, the punishment might be rather excessive; for, at first glance, the punishment does not appear to fit the crime. I don’t know how much weight was given to the fact that she was on probation when she committed the act of voting and whether such circumstances allowed for increased time. That is to say, versus illegally voting under other circumstances: for example, an immigrant who voted, but, because of its immigration status was not eligible to vote.

Thanks for trying to be reasonable, near the end of your long, rambling, contradictory rant.
Of course this “punishment” is absolutely sick, many times more severe than politicians often get for genuine abuses of democracy. In the first place, there is no real reason why the woman should be denied a vote. Secondly, I doubt Texas even counts their black votes. You should live there sometime to see what I mean.

3 Likes

I’ll “see” your point of view MCH, and I’ll raise you one.

This is the most fucked up So-called “Democracy” on Earth, and it’s all because of Trump.

1 Like