Considering that right to work states have lower wages, people are voting to cut their wages, which is foolish.
But then again, it is why the red states are takers since they are the right to work states. And red states take tax money from the liberal states that have unions. But then again red states seem to enjoy poverty, the worst health care, the worst education, the worst in every standard of living. All while living on our dime.
S. Dakota has the top 3 counties in the states for poverty.
S. Dakota’s economy is .3% of the US economy. Now compared to a blue state like NY which is 8.1%. Income per capita is higher than other red states, but lower than any blue state.
Quite frankly the red states should continue to do the same things that make them poverty areas and the worst in standards of living. That only makes blue states more attractive. The only thing I would change is that we should stop subsidizing the red states and let them get by on their own. See how they can get by w/o our money. Because they are doing so poorly with our money, they will sink to new lows w/o it.
And considering how red states complain about takers, then they should be willing to cease to be takers. I fully agree, why should we subsidize the takers from the red states?