I'm glad you're not fooled by the dishonest attempts to portray Trump as a tool of Russia and Vladimir Putin. But your argument for why the boy should be impeached is based on dubious legal grounds. Simply being a degenerate racist is not sufficient cause for impeachment. If it were, then Andrew Jackson and Woodrow Wilson, among others, ought to have been impeached and removed from office.
No, let's focus on Trump's actual crimes, his actual violations of the Constitution. His ongoing violations of the emoluments clause, his unprovoked and unauthorized military action against Syria, his use of a bomb even the Bush-Cheney regime dared not use for fear of mass civilian casualties to get at Afghan militants—these are definitely grounds for impeachment and removal from office.
It's not going to happen, of course; Democrats don't want to impeach over Syria, after all, because Obama illegally attacked Libya and suffered no consequences, nor were his regime's tacit overthrow of the governments of Honduras and Ukraine punished. When it comes to making war and overthrowing lawfully elected governments, Democrats and Republicans are on the same neoconservative, imperialist page. So it'll have to come down to the emoluments clause as grounds for impeachment, although, again, it's unlikely that either major political party much cares enough about that to bother.
The bottom line is that impeachment must be used for the right reasons, not simply to try to overturn the results of the previous election. That way lies disaster, and would indeed plunge the nation into chaos and possible civil war. That's the last thing anyone needs.