I would like to disagree with you on what you said to seatower about Putin being an assassin. I will yield to the idea i have no evidence on hand, but i saw the evidence on Intel Exchange on the deep web. It looked/seemed rather convincing. I would lean towards Seatower l, but you want evidence. Speaking of evidence, how much would you need? Look at evidence of just conflict of interest alone with Trump, yet nothing has really been done. If you understand ballistics at all, it would be obvious that Kennedy was shot by more than one gunman, which the original coroner's analysis said, but that didn't change anything, nor was it enough evidence. If you had evidence, what would you do with it? If you could prove 9/11 was an inside job, what would you do with that evidence, go to the government? To whom? It's not that i disagree with having evidence, but what would you do with it? I have evidence of government involvement in crazy crap, but that doesn't mean I'm going to run and tell anyone. So, if there was hard evidence that you authorize as real evidence to you, who would you tell? The mass media, the Prez, or maybe homeland security? What would you think they would do if you did? So, evidence is wonderful, but it means nothing if you have no plans for it to be released to the public. I truly don't mean to ramble or poke at you, but this is a question I've always had when people bring up needing hard evidence on sensitive issues. We see the system being rather on the corrupt side of things, so who do you tell?