Pretty Clear I thought. Course I like a good lawyer.
Course everyone here wants their burger cooked their own way.
Key Points, for Ms Pelosi…
(Pay Attention here) “if we had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so” (oh, so he did commit crime)
reiterating the central allegation of our indictments, that there were multiple, systemic efforts to interfere in our election. (Russia does Covert Ops ??? Really)
Russian intelligence officers who are part of the Russian military, launched a concerted attack on our political system. (Oh Yeah, We have the same US Ops, that still doesn’t make it legal)
a private Russian entity engaged in a social media operation, where Russian citizens posed as Americans in order to influence an election (Mercs like Blackwater)
the opinion says that the Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing
Well that last one puts is squarely in Pelosi’s court.
We require Impeachment for Resolution.
Is that too oblique for you Ms Pelosi.
BTW…“if we had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so,” and since Special Counsel didn’t say no
That would be a yes, and it requires the Congress to handle the “yes he did” response.