Wall Street plutocrats, and the mainstream media they own, have criticized Sanders for, among other things, his proposals to: raise taxes, raise the minimum wage, increase regulations on businesses and banks. Their critique of Sanders' proposals is that they represent poor policy and are not pragmatic and, therefore, stand no chance of being enacted.
On the other hand, Wall Street plutocrats, and the mainstream media they own, have been supportive of Hillary Clinton. They claim that she has more reasonable positions on taxes, the minimum wage, and regulations, and that her pragmatic approach will get some of this legislation passed.
Clearly, Wall Street plutocrats, and their mainstream media, would prefer no increase in tax, the minimum wage, or regulations. So, if they really think that Bernie Sanders will not be able to get any of this legislation passed and that Hillary Clinton will be able to get her, albeit more moderate, legislation passed, why are they so supportive of Clinton?