I think it’s a rather narrow piece of analysis. Of course, it’s true; but what is unique in expressing this perspective? The really chilling thing about Gates and his foundation is that he has the money, influence, and clout to further a Machine Model of the world that imbues public education with a form of mind cloning (via standardized tests enforced under strict, one size fits all protocols); and he also pushes vaccines which, taken in such diverse combinations, cause weaknesses in the genetics and/or immune systems (added to Autism) in lots of kids.
Control of the food system extends beyond profits in that hungry people can be controlled.
Gates is anti-democratic and a natural-born authoritarian who WANTS the world’s people under HIS (and his colleagues’) control.
The machine model imposed onto nature is as lethal to ecosystems as war is to people, and both models are those preferred by The Dominator Mindset.
This SOB is now pursuing ways to alter the atmosphere and other dangerous inversions of subtle systems that don’t always play true to manmade computer modeling.
To only view the problem through the prism of profits is to limit the field of harm (not to mention, conjecture) immeasurably. Thus the analysis is telling for what it obscures. One “like” is sufficient, an infinite number, the work of a fellow tag team member… artificially boosting ratings.