I find myself thinking that when a self-determined “class” of people sets itself apart by utilizing applied theory of material movement (in this case applying across the spectrum of ‘economy’ and meaning of ‘movement’) that obfuscates the actual details, reality and sources from which that material is extracted; and then uses that separation (margin/periphery/externalization) to further obfuscate, extract and claim “power”, that class is not described by any imaginable positive term of ‘elite’, but is an example of the term effete - which reflects a mortally over-extended male gendered premise of life as nothing if not in constant state of extraction and expansion (see fetishism, narcissism and perversion):
adj. - Depleted of vitality, force, or effectiveness; exhausted: the final, effete period of the baroque style. adj. - Marked by self-indulgence, triviality, or decadence: an effete group of self-professed intellectuals. adj. - Overrefined; effeminate.
The simple reality is that given the opportunity not to be attacked for ethics of stewardship, compassionate, interconnected and nurturing societal values, this planet always has provided life in abundance. So sad that the demands of effete erotic stimulus, sold through generations of “marketing” must now apply the framing of “individual” to not only the ‘corporation’ but to the whole of society (nation state), a definition so far off the mark as to operate demonstrably as death wish.
Nature always has and always will allow for genders that span the spectrum. It is an extractive perversion of ‘power’ that has no strength to encompass, include, love and nurture, that demands subjection to its death wish.