In each of your links Mr Fisk indicates there NO PROOF that Russia or Syria used Chemical weapons. In this last article he claims they undoubtedbly have. The statements do not match.
No one is suggesting the Syrian army have not committed atrocities or that Civilans not killed at their hand.
The Russians killed many Civilians when they took Berlin . It does not follow that in so doing and committing war crimes such as mass rape “They undoubtedly used Nuclear weapons” to flatten the city. Nor does it follow that because they di not use Nuclear weapons on Berlin that they “squeaky clean”.
It important that this stuff be gotten right and claims of poison gas used be factual. That because it not “killing civilians” the Western powers use to get their interventions in places like Yugoslavia , Iraq, Syria and Libya , it is when claims made they have or are using WMDS. In the case of Libya and Iraq they directly lied about this.
I also tend to rely on Mr Fisk for accurate reporting of the facts along with a small number of other reporters and as such hold him to higher standards then i do the hacks. The excellent article by Robert Cook on the Assange case posted today illustrates why getting it right so important when he describes how reporters resort to group think (Assange sought sanctuary in the Ecuadorian Embassy to evade rape charges).