I am not interested in what someone or some site rates anybody. I rate them myself, so what? People are too dependent on what they read from their favorite sources or pundits. It is the main reason why Americans (and others) can be easily manipulated. People take the short cut/easy road and listen to a few selected sources and eventually are unable to trust their own judgement. In effect their shortcuts have left them less informed and they know it.
One site calls her a hard core liberal (which is patently absurd). Imagine Rush Limbaugh, Bill O’Reilly, Dan Savage sitting at a table and each of them saying that the other two are too liberal.
To Dick Cheney, I suppose Hillary is too liberal. So what?
What do you think really matters in the end? What is your opinion? She is too hawkish and supportive of oligarchy to be a liberal. Maybe she could be called a liberal neocon (in my book).
I think voting for someone just because they are female or male, black or white or asian is all bulls**T anyway! That is shallow surface stuff.
The world is in bad shape and if you notice that Hillary hasn’t mentioned her 500 million solar panels promise once since stressing it after her handlers told her to sound more environmental. She is going to pull an Obama bait and switch on that and tell us she wanted to but ‘they’ won’t let her. She isn’t trustworthy and I think a true cynic as well. That matters to me. One of there things to rate her. She is part of the Obama administration… and she has proven it.
Women should look to just how much more of the Woman in the White House Elizabeth Warren would be if she ran after Bernie (very likely) or ran after being Bernie’s Vice Pres (please, please, please!!! lol). They and history would say that women make great presidents if Warren got in after Bernie
. With Hillary, they will get another disappointment like minorities were disappointed by Obama being all promises but nothing else. People thought his skin color would matter but it didn’t. The same for Hillary’s gender. Those are all appearances not substance. Look at what Hillary represents. She is not a progressive just because she is a woman.
She is a conservative democrat and a confirmed hawk who just might want to prove that she is nothing like what women want a woman candidate to be. They want to say the world would be a better place if more women ran things but instead they may get a serious big war because a woman wanted to prove that being a woman was no impediment to being warlike and an aggressive hawk!
