the things I’ve written are deliberately simplyfied (its not meant to be technical either) and my slanders against James Hanson aren’t as mean as they should be… however the comment you responded to was deliberately insulting and disrespectful to AVOID any idea of nuclear advocacy but I didn’t want to be disrespectful of the academy, but now it gets REALLY insulting the other comment mostly exists as a tryout to create repeatabable tropes to kill the trolling fission hordes that are savaging the hehe environment of the internet, I’m not doing this alone either.
again, the academically established green agenda is so very dead sic because a few famous PHDS eg James Hanson, James Lovelock and Steward Brand et al handed the keys to everything green to the nuclear lobby (haha thanks a batch dudes) and to make matters worse the troll hordes over at youtube, slashdot etc started trolling the shit out of poor’lil Greta Thunberg… well the trolling hordes are enjoying themselves with „facts“ that are nothing but historical falsification also irrelevant on so many levels, however its unbelievabley tricky for beginners to debunk an armed troll ie an experienced fission hardliner (and this happens to be why I started developing nuclear-troll-killer-tropes like this very paragraph).
the Greta Thunbergs of the worlds somewhen will have to face the ravaging fission hordes in the hehe real world out there wich happens to be hehe inside the internet and such a troll beating can never be academic, it needs to be fundamental, savage and simple!!!
however factual falsification done by myself wouldn’t help Greta either so this is just to counter your argument but NOT to debate anything, its for the sake of the argument so to speak…
…one of the many problem with what the trolls claim about fission is that nobody seriously considered fission as a scalable solution and then James Hanson et al started running around exactly as if that’d be the case haha (pls consider this: if they didn’t think it is scalable as you sir said, then why bother advocating fission in the first place? and if they’d known the topic only a LITTLE they’d better advocated for LFTR but they didn’t even knew about that oh the sorrow oh the shame! James Hanson‘s EXTREME fission zealotism blamaged himself, the academy, science and helped not one)
I’m sorta thankful for your involuntary „feedback" but I don’t want to dabate nuclear fission.
PS i‘m sorry for abusing the comment section of commondreams for my experiment, but I’ll pay extra!!