I might ask you the same thing. I’ve been on this forum since it began and I have consistently pointed out that there was no justification in international law or treaty that made the US invasion of Iraq, or any of our other military adventures legal. I was merely drawing attention to a statement in the article that was presented as “matter-of-fact”, that is, with Congress blessing, this would be legal. International law does not recognize “pre-emptive” action as justification for military action, nor does it sanction “responsibility to protect” as it has been framed by US militarists. Everyone asks “what can be done?” to throttle US aggression. The international laws and treaties are already in place, Under the “What can be done?” category, it seems to me the rest of the world community would have to act unanimously to sanction and censure the US. Surely you don’t believe there is any faction, either within the MIC or the duopoly, that is going to put a halt to US aggression.
For crying out loud, the reactionary bullshit on this forum has become ridiculous.