It is a fallacious argument.
Trump has not been in a position of power to direct State violence, thus it is a fallacious argument.
This argument was made over and over again by people on the left distracting from criticism of Trump's positions clearly indicative of a war criminal in waiting.
Not much longer to wait.
I mean this appointment comports with such a rational assessment of that likelihood, as does Trump having Petraeus on the short list for Secretary of State.
And back in September taking on James Woolsey as advisor on foreign policy and the Trump military buildup.
I mean, the guy who over and over again said to torture more not less, worse torture, and to make it legal wasn't indicative of a war criminal mentality?