And then there's this.......
"New research shows regulatory “safe” limits for glyphosate may not be safe at all
The approval process for glyphosate herbicide is disputed because the commercial herbicide formulations as sold and used contain additives or co-formulants, which are more toxic than glyphosate alone. Yet glyphosate alone is tested to calculate the ADI or acceptable daily intake, the level that is supposedly safe to consume over the long term. That's in spite of the fact that we are exposed to the formulations, not the isolated presumed active ingredient glyphosate.
A new study shows that the acceptable daily intake (ADI), the supposedly safe level, for glyphosate is unreliable in terms of assessing the risks of the complete commercial formulations that we are actually exposed to.
The co-formulants were shown in the new study to have a far more powerful endocrine-disrupting effect at lower doses than the isolated active ingredient, glyphosate.
The complete formulations were also found to have much greater endocrine disrupting effects at lower doses than glyphosate alone.
The research shows that the ADI should be calculated from toxicity tests on the commercial formulations as sold and used.
In the new study, published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, the researchers measured the endocrine disruptive effects of the co-formulants of six glyphosate herbicides. They measured the activity of aromatase, a key enzyme for the balance of sex hormones, in human placental cells, using a method validated by the OECD to assess endocrine disruptors.
The aromatase activity was significantly decreased both by the co-formulants alone and by the formulations, from doses 800 times lower than the agricultural dilution. But glyphosate alone only showed such an effect from one-third of the agricultural dilution (in other words, glyphosate was much less of an endocrine disruptor than the co-formulants and the formulations)."