It would be difficult to imagine an organization more culpable in war crimes than the BBC. It's imagined reputation for any sort or fair mindedness is long gone. Until its editorial board are properly screened and overseen by a public body representing the license payers for fair and unbiased reporting in foreign affairs its a danger to society both at home and abroad.. Its that dumbed down public who are required to provide BBC poison for themselves and their neighbors through the constant ever increasing annual fee as license payers. They pay outrageous sums to have well rewarded faces on their screens reporting Zionist propaganda determined by a corrupted editorial board of directors. While the article doesn't reveal much as Chilcot sets about tidying up his report, its to be welcomed nonetheless!
Tony Blair has made his fortune. Not alone by any means among those within his government who are responsible for high crimes, he represents a prime target for criminal proceedings to be initiated. Then will the whistles start blowing under oath as required? So many lies and so many liars got front stage to promote their pernicious agenda much as the neocons did across the Atlantic except in Britain it was the BBC flagship that provided the red carpet and platform. The example in the article of Alastair Cambell rushing off to the studios with the great idea to misrepresent the UN situation to the British public and what Blair had decided to lie about in order to smear France, tells us all we need to know about how governments operate. The BBC knows this of course, the present government in Britain knows this too but in the particular case at hand it was a lie in order to gain support for what the main protagonists all knew was to now be an illegal war. It was to be an act of aggression that that had already been decided upon.
Then 'shock and awe' began with all the pomp and ceremony that is a hallmark of BBC coverage to the fore and its after shocks continue into the present. The BBC editorial board again is as responsible as it is possible to be in encouraging such illegal war. Its a 'forte' of the organisation as it wishes Britain to punch above its weight in Empire building with its USA partner. Ask the Palestinians about BBC coverage! If the British people want to prevent Cameron's government from following suit on another illegal war abroad then it can best do so now by protesting against their MSM and the BBC in particular.
Next they should without fail examine whether Chilcot provides cover for war crimes and war criminals like Tony Blair? Do they too follow the USA and look forward or do they demand prosecution and criminal trials that will not alone expose their media to scrutiny but will do more for justice to the victims than any other stepping stone to recovery and remedy.
Mr. Peter Osborne among other colleagues of his should ask himself whether his editors should be asked to resign as a service to the nation and whether they themselves should continue to be richly rewarded for their work in an organization that did much through omission, willful deceit and propaganda to promote the infliction of so much unnecessary suffering abroad? It's distorted, selective and biased and its agenda is obvious and evident for all its professionalism. Its not a news worthy organization but an effective mouthpiece for government elites both at home and abroad. It advertises hypnotism for the masses who fund it and leads them along into the dark side with its balance of fear and imagination; but it consistently lies in the same way Blair did only it is disguised with dishonesty and with inherent greed and publicly subsidized, so largely monopolized dominance. Its become a perverted entity. I refer primarily to its foreign affairs coverage and its TV programs. Mr Osborne should know all this too. That is unconscionable betrayal and just like Blair's was it will undoubtedly bring its own rewards..