This post, the 3rd one in which you take aim at Naomi Klein proves my contention.
In order to reach a lot of people when mass media is VERY costly, groups with significant agendas may indeed accept money from The Rockefellers or anyone else. It's a quid pro quo and likely necessary adaptation to the culture of Dominant Capitalism. So while some might view this as a devil's bargain, that doesn't change the fact that in a corporately run society (media and all) such deals are often inevitable. The Rockefellers and Ford Foundation have an interest in green-washing their operations, and that may explain why they serve as funders. They are not the ONLY funders.
You are pushing the (formerly executed by Tom Carberry) argument that this funding therefore taints their mission.
You're doing a simultaneous character HIT on both Naomi Klein and 350 org as if YOU are doing anywhere NEAR what they are seeking to do--in working against the most empowered (ENERGY) industries in the world--to get the Truth out on climate change.
As a matter of fact, it's people like you working against those working for changes in ENERGY structures and established systems, who convince people that those working for change are tainted. Then, convinced there is no honest leadership nor path away from the grip of today's dirty energy behemoths, you arguably WORK to sustain that same status quo that will lead to species' demise, including our own.
Industry shill! Paid for by ALEC of The Koch Brothers.